Care innovation
DISEASE MANAGEMENT IS NO MORE – LONG LIVE THE CARE [...]
Tips for better cooperation in network care The emergence of [...]
What you should know about outcome funding The costs of [...]
Value-based healthcare should not focus on illness, but on (positive) health in the broadest sense of the word.
-
Is Value Based Healthcare the panacea for real healthcare efficiency? Or is it a pseudo-innovation, or renovation approach?
-
How do you create real value with triple aim, value based healthcare and other forms of care in practice? Get started with an integral business case.
The first line seems to be increasingly sidelined in the Netherlands. Healthcare financiers are increasingly focusing on the hospital. But the dominant focus on cost-cutting in hospitals is not going to solve the problems we face in healthcare. We need to go back to the basics and build from there. Value-driven care models from abroad can help us do this.
Both Value Based Healthcare (VBHC) and Triple Aim claim to be the solution to the increasing demand and costs for healthcare in the Netherlands. Both concepts are often referred to as value-driven care in the same breath. But is that right, are the principles of both concepts the same? We can be brief about that: no. In this blog I zoom in on the two concepts and highlight the three main differences.
-
In recent years there has been unrest surrounding integrated care. The fee that general practitioners receive from the health insurance company for integrated care, on top of the regular fee, is under threat. And is chain care in the Netherlands really chain care? And does integrated care work for people with multimorbidity?
